Ka Leo o ka Lahui, Volume II, Number 304, 19 October 1891 — ON DIT. [ARTICLE]

ON DIT.

T;mr the jury in the trial of V >ti\V* Bni, after :iii abs HK'c froni tne court, returß*d artd st«tr ed throttfrh their forenfi.nn, that they eouhi not render a verdict, bocau&9 h>ftriy jurors inS)Btod that they ha# been bwwr\ to |he upon auj fer il hottßo-breakin^ ,> and no< \mdcr an amended in«

dictment «fi*sr *&&&? aU the had &pm : beipg on p€iatfcMi jai3r. rendereā a Whoeaai say that Hawaiiai* ?!arors iocai«riecrtimzB alfeer That it is not en*sty to antscml to arreet a man tate the ' pain, and care that Mr. Quinn does with hiB aniooale, That in thi9 Jsr&t five wsfeks m bnilding the eea-wall, fbr ground for \the new dredgef* feet m two tiers of * coral wail was •laid by the former luna; -now, in the eame period, ohly ll>® feet .tWo tiers have been iaid, r by th# Ah(i that the pay-roll in the former instance was .from tliree to 4b«r hundred dcrllars weekly. aad in the latter, #&h more » hands, ■ and iess WO?jfe. done, the pay : roll p# week % hasbeen four :to five hundred dollars. How m this for the- sweet Mahope.

That according to tl ßarefooted" testiraony, and indentifioation of certain parties as bt4ug behind* him and|ashavinp; hirM him to do the depredatioos, whieh he did the past summer, one is lead to believe that there was a deep laid scheme to create an unpoj>tilar feeling againstJ the Marshal, who as near as?we ean fathom is trying to do his best inj tlie discharge of his duty. :But how about this teātimony. and why is it not noticed is soniething- that >would require a Phiiadelaphia jlawyer to unrav el.

Thnt when a snperintendent in charge of work ean be mtimidated by his workiu|en, he is^notfit a for that position. j Thai a man di<jl this to a gowriimL'iit olKeial on f> tbe watcT-frorit ; his fist in his fāce and refusing to do what he was told to, it proves conL:lusively that there was some truth that the Supenntendent of Public Works, was obliged to-enforce one of his subordinate comniands. * •